In their own words
You may be wondering what the difference is between a Presbyterian and a Lutheran. The Lutheran Church, Missouri Synod has addressed this question for us.
From the LCMS website
Q. How does the Missouri Synod differ from the Presbyterian Church?
A. As is the case with most mainline denominations today, there are specific issues such as the ordination of women, abortion, homosexuality, etc., that divide the distinct Presbyterian church bodies (for example, the Presbyterian Church in the USA (PCUSA) and the more conservative Presbyterian Church in America (PCA)). Such differences typically stem from more fundamental differences concerning the authority of Scripture itself. Having said this, the major theological differences between historic Lutheranism and Presbyterianism (and other churches of Calvinistic background and theological orientation) include the following:
- The centrality of the Gospel. Presbyterian churches tend to emphasize the "glory" or "sovereignty" of God as the central teaching of Scripture, while Lutherans believe that the central teaching of Scripture–and the key to understanding and interpreting the Bible-is the Gospel: the Good News of Salvation for sinners by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone.
- The nature of Christ's atonement. Lutherans believe that when Jesus died on the cross He atoned for the sins of all people of all time-even those who have not or will not come to faith in Christ and will spend eternity in hell. Some Presbyterian churches teach a "limited atonement" of Christ, i.e., that Christ's death on the cross atoned only for the sins of "the elect"–those who have been predestined from eternity to believe in Christ and will spend eternity with Him in heaven.
- Predestination. Most Presbyterian churches teach a "double predestination," i.e., that some people are predestined by God from eternity to be saved and others are predestined by God from eternity to be damned. Lutherans believe that while God, in his grace in Christ Jesus, has indeed chosen from eternity to save those who trust in Jesus Christ, He has not predestined anyone to damnation. Those who are saved are saved by grace alone; those who are damned are damned not by God's choice but because of their own sin and stubbornness. This is a mystery that is incomprehensible to human reason (as are all true Scriptural articles of faith).
- The authority of Scripture. A fourth difference has to do with the proper use of reason and its relationship to the authority of Scripture. Lutherans look to Scripture alone as the source of all Christian doctrine, and hold to the teachings of Scripture even when they are incomprehensible to human reason. Some Presbyterian churches tend to place human reason alongside Scripture as a source of doctrinal authority, and seek to bring seemingly paradoxical Scriptural truths into harmony with human reason in ways that (in our view) undermine the truthfulness and authority of Scripture.
- The Sacraments. Most Presbyterian churches (to a greater or lesser degree) view the sacraments of Baptism and the Lord's Supper merely as "signs" or "symbols" of God's grace. Lutherans believe that Baptism and the Lord's Supper (which is the true body and blood of Christ in, with, and under bread and wine) are actual means of God's grace through which the Holy Spirit works to convey and/or strengthen faith.
A more detailed discussion of the differences between Lutherans and Calvinist churches may be found in "Churches in America" by Thomas Manteufel, available from Concordia Publishing House in St. Louis (1-800-325-3040).
I will follow up with some commentary on these items as time permits. Stay tuned…





Lemme see. I'd also include "Sabbath" on that list. The WCF itself is pretty hard core Sabbatarian, even if the PCA allows exceptions on that score. As far as I know, exceptions never go the extent of the Lutheran confessions on the abolition of the Sabbath in the New Covenant. (Or at least you're given a hard time if you go that far.)
Some practical differences as well: Lutheran churches have an altar (although that may be a corollary to our view of the sacrament); Lutheran worship tends to be more liturgical (I know there are some more liturgical churches in the PCA, but I'm speaking on average); Lutherans make the sign of the cross (slight broader reading of the regulative principle and broader inclusion of what is adiaphora); each group's teaching regarding the content of the "third use of the law" differs in substance.
I see if I can come up with some more.
I don't agree with all that is on the original list. The thing about "reason and scripture" is implied from the disagreement over "limited" atonement and the sacraments: Lutherans say that Presbyterians push too far. I think there's some truth in that, regarding what the Bible teaches about those specific doctrines, but I wouldn't turn "reason" into some sort of structuring principle that diminishes their doctrine of the Scriptures on that account.
There is also some disagreement over the nature of Jesus, also stemming from the disagreement over the sacraments. (Reformed Christians often ultimately say that Jesus is physically in heaven, therefore he cannot be present in the Supper. Lutherans do not beleive that you can split Jesus' natures like that: where God the Son is present, his body is present as well.